Banana AnalyticsBANANAANALYTICS

County profile

Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, Connecticut Community Health Profile

Environmental risk, disease burden, provider access, and SDOH scores for community health needs assessment and service line planning. Fused from EPA, CDC, CMS, and Census data into a single free view.

Opportunity Score

29Below Avgout of 100

Env

38

−12 vs scale midpoint

Disease

33

−17 vs scale midpoint

Provider

14

−37 vs scale midpoint

SDOH

41

−9 vs scale midpoint

FIPS: 09180Population: 279,634Risk overview: No multiple-score screening flag

Specific health risk patterns

No specific risk patterns triggered in Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region; 3 are close to the threshold

3 signals near threshold: Respiratory Burden (59) · Smoke Burden (59) · Industrial Burden (58)

8 signals evaluated. See all signal methodologies →

Where Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region stands

Fewer than two displayed scores reach the screening threshold

Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, Connecticut has these published scores: Environmental Risk 37.6/100; Disease Burden 33.4/100; Provider Gap 13.5/100; SDOH Composite 41.0/100. None of the published scores reach the screening threshold of 70. The SDOH Composite summarizes social and economic conditions. Reviewing its underlying measures can help identify which conditions warrant closer local assessment. These weighted scores support screening and comparison; a score of 70 does not mean that 70% of counties have lower scores.

Methodology: when three or more of the four major health-risk areas (pollution, chronic disease, doctor access, social and economic conditions) have displayed scores of at least 70/100, we call the pattern “multi-pillar convergence.” The scoring approach and citations live on the methodology page.

Risk profile

Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region compared to Connecticut

Four scores on a 0–100 scale. Higher values indicate greater relative burden or need within each measure. The reference line at 50 marks the scale midpoint.

Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region four-pillar profile20406080100Disease BurdenEnv RiskSDOH compositeProvider Gap

Environmental Risk (38), Disease Burden (33), Provider Gap (14), and SDOH Composite (41) are at or below the scale midpoint of 50/100.

  • Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region
  • Connecticut state mean
  • Scale midpoint (50)
  • Signal threshold (70)

Current Conditions

Today's air quality, fires, and weather alerts

Live operational data for Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region: real-time AQI from EPA AirNow, active fires from NIFC, and any National Weather Service advisories. Updated daily.

Current Air Quality
14Good
PM2.5: 2.6 µg/m³ · 2026-09-25
Source: EPA AirNow
Nearest Active Wildfire
TNC W BRANCH 3 RX
273 km away · 0 acres
0 fires within 100 km · 0 within 200 km
Source: NIFC active fire perimeters

Environmental Factors

Air, water, and exposure indicators

Top environmental indicators for Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region with state and national benchmarks. Full profile covers 40+ metrics on the platform.

These indicators describe environmental conditions and potential exposure. They are not a complete record of environmental incidents in Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region and do not establish the cause of an individual illness. Check each measure's source and reporting period in the data-source reference and review the scoring methods.

IndicatorSoutheastern Connecticut Planning RegionCT avgUS avg
EPA AQS / EJSCREEN
6.6
µg/m³
▼ -12% vs CT
7.47.4
EPA AQS / EJSCREEN
66.9
ppb
▲ +3.2% vs CT
64.857.1
Traffic Proximity
EJSCREEN
862,010
index
▼ -57% vs CT
1,999,458291,320
Superfund Proximity
EPA EJSCREEN
0.19
score
▼ -15% vs CT
0.220.16
EPA EJSCREEN
0.26
score
▼ -73% vs CT
0.963.39

PFAS in sampled water systems

EPA UCMR5 observations for systems associated with these counties through reported service ZIP codes. These results are displayed separately and do not contribute to the Environmental Risk score.

Loading sampled-system observations…

How Superfund proximity contributes

The 2024 EJSCREEN proximity indicator is 0.1927. It uses distances to proposed/final National Priorities List and Superfund Alternative Approach sites within 10 km. This is proximity context, not a measurement of heavy-metal exposure or illness.

The score without this component is 35.4; with it, 37.6. Its effective weight is 8.73%. The difference reflects methodology, not changed local conditions.

Component weights, scaling and limitations

Health Outcomes

Chronic disease prevalence

CDC PLACES model-based prevalence estimates for adults in Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region. Full profile covers 15+ health outcomes plus mortality on the platform.

Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region chronic disease prevalence vs. CDC PLACES national benchmarksFrequent mental distress (14+ days)14.516.6Depression21.123.1Current asthma (adults)9.811.7Cancer (any, excl. skin)7.18.7Diabetes11.410.0COPD6.66.3Coronary heart disease6.06.1Stroke3.23.3510152025Prevalence (%)
Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region adult disease prevalence vs. CDC PLACES national benchmarks, ranked by absolute divergence. Green connectors mark conditions where Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region is below the benchmark; terracotta where above.National benchmarkSoutheastern Connecticut Planning Region
ConditionSoutheastern Connecticut Planning RegionCT avgUS avg
Current Asthma
% of adults with current asthma
11.7%
▲ +6.4% vs CT
11.0%10.6%
COPD
% of adults with diagnosed COPD
6.3%
▲ +7.8% vs CT
5.8%8.6%
Diabetes
% of adults with diagnosed diabetes
10.0%
-0.6% vs CT
10.1%13.7%
Coronary Heart Disease
% of adults with CHD
6.1%
▲ +2.4% vs CT
6.0%7.9%
Depression
% of adults ever diagnosed with depression
23.1%
▲ +9.5% vs CT
21.1%23.1%
Frequent Mental Distress
% of adults with 14+ poor mental health days/month
16.6%
▲ +5.1% vs CT
15.8%17.2%

Provider Supply

Specialty physician density per 100,000 residents

Active providers in Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region from the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Compared to the U.S. average for each specialty. Adjacency adjustment is applied separately in the Provider Gap pillar score.

SpecialtySoutheastern Connecticut Planning RegionUS avg
Primary Care
Family medicine, internal medicine, general practice, pediatrics.
127.9
per 100k
-1.9% vs US
130.4
Cardiology
Cardiovascular disease, electrophysiology, interventional cardiology.
17.9
per 100k
▲ +48% vs US
12.1
Pulmonology
Respiratory disease specialists — relevant to PM2.5 and wildfire smoke exposure.
9.0
per 100k
▲ +49% vs US
6.0
Psychiatry
Mental health prescribers; complements behavioral health access.
39.1
per 100k
▲ +109% vs US
18.7
Oncology / Hematology
Cancer specialists.
8.2
per 100k
▲ +29% vs US
6.4
Neurology
Neurological disease specialists.
10.0
per 100k
▲ +27% vs US
7.9

Source: CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Counts reflect providers with a primary practice address in Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region; specialty is taken from the provider's primary NUCC taxonomy code.

Pro analytical view

What drives this county's scores

The flagged signals and service-line opportunities for Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, plus the methodology decomposition behind each score. Visible to Pro, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise tiers.

Where to focus

Pro feature

Top flagged signals + service lines are a Pro feature

See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.

Score decomposition

Each named signal's component breakdown with weights. The bar length is the component's percentile rank; the parenthetical is its weight in the final blend.

Pro feature

Score decomposition is a Pro feature

See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.

Tract drill-down

Census tracts inside Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region

Pro feature

Tract-level drill-down is a Pro feature

See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.

On the full platform

What else is available for Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region

The page above is a subset. The free Community account unlocks the full single-county profile: every indicator, every data source, demographics, historical trends, and mortality data. Professional unlocks multi-county comparison, compound signal analysis, service line rankings, and consultant-ready PDF reports.

Full Environmental Profile

All 40+ environmental metrics including toxic releases, hazardous site proximity, PFAS detection, pesticide exposure, and climate stress indicators.

Service Line Opportunities

See how Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region ranks for respiratory, oncology, cardiovascular, renal, endocrine, and behavioral health service line opportunity.

Multi-County Comparison

Compare Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region side-by-side with neighboring counties across every dimension.

Trend Analysis

5-year sparklines for health outcomes, SDOH measures, and mortality rates so you can see where the county is heading, not just where it is today.

PDF Report Export

Generate a consultant-ready environmental health briefing for Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region with methodology citations. Drops straight into a CHNA or grant application.

See pricing →

Data sources: EPA AQS, EPA EJSCREEN, EPA TRI, CDC PLACES, CDC WONDER, CMS NPPES, Census ACS, County Health Rankings, NOAA ACIS, NCI State Cancer Profiles. Every score on this page is derived from publicly available federal data, fused by the Banana Analytics pipeline.

Methodology: See the full scoring methodology (v1.2.0) for weights, sensitivity analysis, and validation against county-level mortality data.

Last refreshed: September 9, 2026